Risk Management of Construction Schedule Based on UMT Evaluation Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/wgcvzy73Keywords:
Construction schedule risk, uncertainty measurement theory (UMT), entropy weight method, risk assessment system, dynamic risk management, construction engineering.Abstract
Construction progress risk management of construction projects is faced with the complexity, dynamics and uncertainty of multi-source risk factors. Traditional methods rely on a single indicator or empirical judgment, making it difficult to systematically reveal the risk transmission mechanism. Therefore, an integrated assessment model integrating work breakdown structure (WBS), risk breakdown structure (RBS) and uncertainty measurement theory (UMT) is proposed in this paper. A four-class risk assessment system including 18 key risk factors is constructed, covering four causes: organization management, resource supply, technology implementation and external environment. The risk level is divided into four levels I (extremely high risk) to IV (low risk). Through the combination of expert scoring method and entropy weight method to determine the weight of each index, establish the risk factor adjacency matrix. Taking DK-1 project of Rongchuang Yuhe Chenyuan as the empirical object, the uncertainty measurement function of single index is constructed by Matlab platform, and the measurement evaluation matrix of each risk factor is calculated. The results show that UMT evaluation method can effectively deal with the risk assessment problem under the condition of incomplete information, realize the organic integration of qualitative analysis and quantitative evaluation, and provide a new technical path for dynamic identification and scientific management of complex project schedule risk. In practical cases, the method improves the accuracy of risk identification by about 30% compared with traditional methods.
Downloads
References
[1] Xing Lili. Risk factor identification and analysis for architectural design projects [J]. Entrepreneur World, 2007, (3), 102 -103.
[2] Tang Kun, Wu Lihuan. Monte Carlo Simulation in Project Risk Analysis [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2024, (3), 83 -86.
[3] Wan J P, Liu Y Q.A System Dynamics Model for Risk Analysis during Project Construction Process [J]. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2014, 2 (6), 451-454.
[4] Johari S, Jha K N. Impact of Work Motivation on Construction Labor Productivity [J]. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2020, 36 (5), 04020052.
[5] Cheng Y, Yuan J, Zhu L, et al. Risk Propagation Model and Simulation of Schedule Changein Construction Projects: A Complex Network Approach [J]. Complexity, 2020, 8854609.
[6] Mustapha Z, AkoMah B B, Mensah D, et al. Boosting Construction Workers’ Performances Through Motivation: A Study in Ghana [J]. Built Environment Journal, 2024, 21 (2): 553 - 568.
[7] Liu Huijing. Comprehensive evaluation of mine gas explosion emergency rescue capability based on unascertained measure [J]. Coal Engineering, 2023, 55 (01): 180 - 186.
[8] He Shangsen, Liu Ruipeng, Yu Hong, Song Le. Evaluation and analysis of mine roadway safety risk based on unascertained measure theory [J]. China Energy and Environmental Protection, 2024, 46 (06): 24-29.
[9] Wang Shi, Tang Mingkun, Wu Rui, Liu Yaohua, Liu Long, Yang Kun, Ma Xiangyu. Risk assessment of blockages in ultra-long distance pipeline transportation at Caojiatan Coal Mine [J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2025, 25 (04): 1275 -1285.
[10] Jin Chunling, An Xiang, Gong Li, Ji Zhaotai, Guan Qiaoyu. Research on Low-Carbon Construction Evaluation of Railway Tunnels Based on G2-CRITIC-UMT Model [J]. Railway Standard Design, 2025, 69 (01): 139-146.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







