Research on Fire Risk Assessment in Machining Workshop Based on Bayesian Network

Authors

  • Haoquan Wang School of Engineering, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, China, 430000

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/rg7fn930

Keywords:

Bayesian Network, Machining Workshop, Fire, Risk Assessment, Sensitivity Analysis.

Abstract

In mechanical processing workshops, fire hazards gravely threaten safety and property. Existing assessment methods fail to comprehensively account for multi-factor interactions. This study innovatively applies the Bayesian network model to this field for the first time. The model, featuring 20 tertiary and 5 secondary nodes, covers hazardous gas storage, operational norms, and equipment conditions. Empirical analysis reveals a 0.16 probability of fire due to improper hazardous gas cylinder storage at the secondary level. Sensitivity analysis shows that "uninspected oxygen and acetylene cylinders upon entry" significantly impacts "non-standard gas welding operations", while hose aging and backfire preventer damage also strongly influence risks. Forward inference identifies key fire-causing factors, with probabilities up to 0.22 at the tertiary level and 0.3 at the secondary level. Reverse inference indicates improper hazardous chemical cylinder storage as the most likely cause during a fire. This study confirms that non-standard operations and equipment aging are pivotal. The Bayesian network's multi-level design and bidirectional inference enable precise risk quantification, offering a scientific basis for safety management and paving the way for dynamic evaluations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Jiang Fuchuan, Zhang Siyu, Zhang Guoqing, Niu Yue, Li Menglin, Liu Peishun. Case decision-making research on coal mine safety investment based on DS evidence-regret theory [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(12): 16-23.

[2] Mu Meili, Zheng Yan. Risk analysis of laboratory safety accidents based on data-driven bayesian network [J/OL] Laboratory research and exploration, 2025: 1-7.

[3] Yang Man, Yuan Bihe, Chen Xianfeng. Based on DBN of benzene leakage disaster chain and chain scission and mitigation research [J/OL]. Safety and environmental engineering, 2025: 1-7

[4] Yao Yao, Cheng Min, Luo Guangying, et al. Application evaluation of hospital infection risk assessment model based on Analytic Hierarchy Process-Risk Matrix Method [J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology, 2025, (10): 1536-154.

[5] Wang Qi’ang, Liu Quan, Ma Zhanguo, Ni Yiqing, Jiang Jian, Chen Jin, Wu Ziyan. Structural performance assessment based on sparse Bayesian learning and improved D-S evidence theory multi-source data fusion [J]. Engineering Mechanics.

[6] Song Yinghua, Liu Ziqi, Liu Dan, Fang Danhui. Scenario deduction of fire and explosion accidents in chemical industrial parks based on fuzzy Bayesian network [J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2022, 29(03): 86-93.

[7] Junyung Kim, Asad Ullah Amin Shah, Hyun Gook Kang. Dynamic risk assessment with Bayesian network and clustering analysis [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2020, 201 (prepublish).

[8] Liu Yanping, Wang Zuowen, Pu Wanli. Cost risk assessment of prefabricated building projects under EPC mode based on combined weighting-evidence theory-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method [J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2022, 22(11): 4562-4571.

[9] Han Wen, Yu Zhaoyang, Liu Fei, et al. Gas explosion risk assessment based on entropy weight method improved fuzzy Bayesian network [J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2025, 56(01): 52-61.

[10] Xu Jianqiang, Liu Xiaoyong, Su Yanfei, Huang Qiansheng. Research on dynamic fire risk assessment method for buildings based on Bayesian network [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2019, 15(02): 138-144.

[11] Wang Guangyan, Ma Zhijun, Hu Qiwei. Fault tree analysis based on Bayesian network [J]. Systems Engineering Theory & Practice, 2004, (06): 78-83.

[12] Guo Chuijiang, Zhong Fuyou, Gan Xin, et al. Bayesian network assessment and diagnosis of operational risks in the Trans-Caspian International Transport Corridor [J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2025, 25(04): 1267-127.

[13] Zhao Bing, Xu Qing. Aviation logistics supply chain resilience evaluation based on Bayesian network [J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2025, 25(10): 4386-4395.

[14] Wang Tingting. Research on fire risk assessment of rail transit underground stations based on Bayesian network. Chongqing University, 2022-06-01.

[15] Gao Mingke, Chen Yimin, Zhang Dianhua, et al. Research on Gesture Recognition Method Based on Evidence Theory Fusion [J]. Computer Application and Software ,2018,35(01):191-194+260.

[16] A. C, N. S, G. P, et al. Bayesian approach for multigamma radionuclide quantification applied on weakly attenuating nuclear waste drums [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2021, 68(9): 2342-2349.

[17] Yuanbin W, Chong Z. Early warning about coal mine safety based on improved PNN-DS Evidence Theory [J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 1769(1): 012057-.

[18] Xie Xiaoliang, Tian Yuzhang. Dynamic bayesian network scenario deduction for rainstorms considering decision-makers’ emotions [J]. Yellow River, 2024, 46(04): 55-61.

[19] Liu Jinglei, Peng Qiyuan, Chen Jinqu. Regional multi-mode rail transit network resilience assessment based on Bayesian network [J]. Railway Transport and Economy, 2025, 47(03): 151-160.

[20] Zeng Tao, Wei Lijun, Duo Yingquan, et al. Dynamic probability analysis of multi-disaster coupling in chemical tank farm [J]. Fire Science and Technology,2025,44(02):190-195+201.

Downloads

Published

19-10-2025

How to Cite

Wang, H. (2025). Research on Fire Risk Assessment in Machining Workshop Based on Bayesian Network. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 156, 37-47. https://doi.org/10.54097/rg7fn930